Библиотека

Write and deliver a one-minute introduction with two listening cues, then answer a newcomer’s question.

Write a comparison separating sound observations from reactions and record a supported preference.

Recommend a cue, explain exact timing and write a separate response to the director’s concern.

Write a text-and-performance comparison review and defend it with two audible examples at matching words.

Write a 180-word imagined letter in Della’s voice and annotate three language choices with story evidence.

Compare both performance plans and justify one in a written staging note and spoken rehearsal discussion.

Explain the turning point in three minutes, supported by two short references, and write a concise interpretation note.

Write and deliver a focused comparison of the original and completed sound designs for one scene.

Write and record a 60-second accessible introductory label for the selected artwork.

Write a spoiler-free review script and record a 90-second recommendation with two examples and one reservation.

Curate the three images, compare an alternative order and give a supported final curator explanation.

The Person Taking Notes Is Not the Jury: practise a precise account, evidence-based clarification and a written outcome. Jurisdiction: England and Wales; an adult criminal trial in a magistrates’ court.

A Bench at the Wrong Entrance: practise a precise account, evidence-based clarification and a written outcome. Jurisdiction: England; fictional local park consultation; Cabinet Office principles are a comparison, not binding local procedure.

One Chart, Two Different Totals: practise a precise account, evidence-based clarification and a written outcome. Jurisdiction: Bristol, England; dated 2026–27 official budget reference and explicitly fictional comparison cases.

Closed on the Screen, Dark on the Street: practise a precise account, evidence-based clarification and a written outcome. Jurisdiction: England; fictional ordinary residential road and council.

The Bag Was Missing, but the Time Was Not Certain: practise a precise account, evidence-based clarification and a written outcome. Jurisdiction: Ireland; fictional Garda station enquiry about an item possibly left in a Dublin taxi.

The Appointment Folder with an Unanswered Question: practise a precise account, evidence-based clarification and a written outcome. Jurisdiction: Republic of Cyprus; MEU1 registration certificate for an EU citizen in employed activity, not a third-country residence permit.

The Decision Used an Old Address: practise a precise account, evidence-based clarification and a written outcome. Jurisdiction: England; fictional non-statutory council community-access service; no real appeal entitlement or deadline is taught.

Give a response that acknowledges, disagrees with evidence and proposes an alternative. Practise with a complete fictional case, a captioned listening model and a separate transfer situation.

Use a fictional role card to state a limit, make a clear request and respond to one pushback without threats or a required personal disclosure. Practise with a complete fictional case, a captioned listening model and a separate transfer situation.

Mediate a three-person role-play and write the final task agreement. Practise with a complete fictional case, a captioned listening model and a separate transfer situation.

Role-play a refusal and write a follow-up that states the limit, impact and one feasible alternative. Practise with a complete fictional case, a captioned listening model and a separate transfer situation.

Use a supplied fictional event sequence to tell a two-minute story with a setup, unexpected turn and resolution; answer a listener’s question and write a short version. Practise with a complete fictional case, a captioned listening model and a separate transfer situation.

Use a fictional personal decision record to explain the original view, the new information and the revised choice, then answer one question about what remains uncertain. Practise with a complete fictional case, a captioned listening model and a separate transfer situation.

Use one fictional event record to create a voice message for a friend and a short message for a colleague, then explain three choices of detail or tone. Practise with a complete fictional case, a captioned listening model and a separate transfer situation.

Use a simulated call with a misheard detail and a conflicting written confirmation to clarify the discrepancy, confirm the corrected arrangements and send a concise summary explaining the correction. Practise with a complete fictional case, a captioned listening model and a separate transfer situation.

Use a short message thread to invite someone, respond to one scheduling problem, offer an alternative and confirm the agreed plan. Practise with a complete fictional case, a captioned listening model and a separate transfer situation.

Turn stakeholder statements into a precise input-output specification with thresholds, hysteresis, acknowledgement, sensor-fault behavior and test cases.

Use three safe simulated voltage readings to locate an open path, state the remaining uncertainty and propose one targeted power-off continuity test.

Read a fictional motor-control diagram as a sequence of permissives, contactor action, feedback, interlocks, fault timeout and deliberate restart.

Use a low-voltage simulation, ordered readings and a technician dialogue to isolate a reversed LED without treating a first guess as a fact.

Compare two fictional product summaries against a household's actual needs, including local control, cloud dependence, data retention and user override.

Build a high-integrity robot-cell event report from scanner records, safety-controller response, eyewitness observation, immediate actions and unresolved questions.

Design and test a plain-English hallway lighting rule with motion, ambient light, timeout, sleep-window behavior and manual override priority.

Reconstruct a fictional conveyor stoppage from PLC events and operator observations while keeping actions and possible causes in separate report sections.

Clarify dietary needs without assuming, compare two dinner timings and agree a practical meal with ingredient checks and an explicit fallback.

Build a timed route from service cut-offs, task durations and travel buffers, then explain what must be deferred when a queue grows.

Adapt a simple meal using drained weights and package instructions; explain how the substitute changes texture, liquid and sequence.

Rebuild a realistic day after a cancelled morning train, decide what to keep, postpone or delegate, and send clear updates to everyone affected.

Practise a tightly scripted gas-emergency call: location, observations, uncertainty, clarification and accurate read-back.

Give venue staff a clear missing-child description, separate last seen from assumed movement, correct a detail and agree a contact plan.

Report a changing leak from a safe location, answer short follow-up questions and hand over observations without diagnosing the cause.

Give an exact roadside location, report only observable facts, mark uncertainty, follow an operator-led sequence, and read back the action clearly.

Coordinate a van, keys, lift booking and helper under uncertain timings, with a realistic decision point and fallback.

Three housemates negotiate a temporary chore rota that accounts for shift changes, task length and the work of remembering.

Practice a bounded B1-B2 discussion and written outcome using one coherent fictional case, explicit evidence and a supplied transfer scenario.

Describe observable appliance symptoms without inventing a diagnosis, answer clarification questions, and confirm a workable repair visit with explicit access conditions.

Compare two fictional rental options, uncover missing costs and commute assumptions, ask precise follow-up questions and make a conditional recommendation.

Reconstruct two missed appointments, challenge an inaccurate access note, and obtain a dated recovery plan with a named owner.

Compare a booking, invoice and call record; distinguish what the evidence proves from what still needs checking.

A shopper checks three suspicious receipt lines, separates two real errors from one misunderstanding, and confirms a precise card refund.

Document a damaged or incomplete delivery, separate evidence from assumptions, request a workable remedy, and confirm the next step.

Move an existing appointment when several alternatives conflict, repair a misheard time and location, and confirm the final agreement without ambiguity.

Friends choose between two fictional walking itineraries using real seasonal rainfall estimates near Lisbon and Porto, a numerical constraint and a backup plan.

Residents compare two original dated land-use maps of a fictional town and separate measured change from speculation about causes.

Two students compare Cairo and Singapore using the same NASA gridded climatology, correct an axis error and distinguish averages from forecasts.

A river-travel editor and a boat guide turn six place profiles into a connected account of the Danube, linking tributaries, cities, a gorge and a delta.

A community exercise uses the original 29 July 2023 Osoyoos order and map to test boundaries, issue times and the limits of route information.

A fictional York household uses the documented 26 December 2015 warning sequence to distinguish preparation, urgent action and an evacuation instruction.

A visitor-desk team distinguishes a dated scientific alert from a dated park closure and corrects a misleading announcement.

Two residents prepare a careful explanation of an archived San Francisco liquefaction map, separating ground conditions from the condition of a particular building.

Build a one-minute incident–time–observations–actions–change handover and answer responder questions with known facts or explicit unknowns.

Prioritize location and scene safety, distinguish observation from inference, confirm instructions, and report condition changes in a simulated call.

Report the cause, body area, appearance, timing and scene risks in a fictional call, then confirm current operator instructions.

Prioritize location, exposure, breathing and swelling observations; identify a prescribed device without teaching product technique; and update change.

Use a fictional seven-day log to describe patterns, change one routine variable, and report a cautious conclusion.

Compare a media claim with dated authoritative guidance, distinguish broad guidance from individual need, and write a bounded fact-check.

Normalize two fictional nutrition labels, compare several nutrients, and make a qualified choice for one stated scenario.

Read categories in current general guidance, map a fictional adult's week, add barriers and backups, and review rather than prescribe.

Reconstruct a precise but cautious symptom history, separate observation from interpretation, and prepare a concise appointment opening.

Read a fictional referral notice, distinguish fixed instructions from missing details, and make a concise clarification call.

Prepare a medicines list, prioritize questions, answer factually, and use teach-back to check the next step.

Navigate a fictional over-the-counter label, distinguish identity, purpose, warnings and directions, and use safe clarification language.

Create a first-person daily schedule for an unnamed bakery worker, with a separate evidence note.

Write and record a 90-second museum guide for a visitor who confuses languages with scripts.

Produce a source-based profile and defend two corrections to the proposed museum label.

Create a three-object museum explanation, separating visible features from interpretation and identifying two evidence limits.

Present a before-and-after map explanation that distinguishes proposals, completed changes and continuity.

Reconstruct the schedule from the supplied record, then write a reform proposal supported by a primary-source excerpt.

Explain the historical map and use the supplied comparison to correct a misleading count-based claim.

Summarise documented inspection activity, explain the official viewpoint and replace the unsupported caption.

Draw a labelled four-stop schematic and write a merchant diary with a separate source note.

Prepare a comparison panel and a spoken response to the headline “One visitor destroyed an entire economy”.

Write a paired-source exhibit label and explain its observation, judgment and missing-voice distinctions.

Create a sourced day-in-the-port account with a schematic, a cargo list and two distinct perspectives.

Write a gallery label analysing message, likely audience, two persuasive visual choices and one evidence limit.

Compare three wording choices in the two translations and recommend one approach for the museum audience.

Make a five-event timeline and explain the practical and symbolic aims to an overseas reader.

Annotate two repeated language features and give a two-minute explanation of their effect in the Hay draft.

Annotate the short linked NASA landing transcript window and present a source-based sequence explanation using speaker, order and communication function.

Write a short evidence-based microhistory that separates the row’s information, historical context and unknown experience.

Annotate one authentic diary entry, separating events from viewpoint, and place it on the verified airlift timeline.

Create a one-day menu for the supplied household, calculate remaining weekly stock and explain three constraints.

White Coral Is a Warning, Not a Verdict. Practise reading evidence, explaining a decision, answering questions and writing a usable outcome in English.

The Blue Patch Beside the Ferry Road. Practise reading evidence, explaining a decision, answering questions and writing a usable outcome in English.

Two Beakers, One Careful Claim. Practise reading evidence, explaining a decision, answering questions and writing a usable outcome in English.

The Notice at Eastbank Library. Practise reading evidence, explaining a decision, answering questions and writing a usable outcome in English.

Five Rules Before the Boardwalk. Practise reading evidence, explaining a decision, answering questions and writing a usable outcome in English.

The Shortest Green Line Is Not Always the Best. Practise reading evidence, explaining a decision, answering questions and writing a usable outcome in English.

A Beaver Release Is More Than a Suitable Stream. Practise reading evidence, explaining a decision, answering questions and writing a usable outcome in English.

A Quieter Trail, but Access for Whom?. Practise reading evidence, explaining a decision, answering questions and writing a usable outcome in English.

The Bag That Filled Up Every Evening. Practise reading evidence, explaining a decision, answering questions and writing a usable outcome in English.

An Agreement That Still Leaves Dry Clothes. Practise reading evidence, explaining a decision, answering questions and writing a usable outcome in English.

Where Did the Day’s Water Go?. Practise reading evidence, explaining a decision, answering questions and writing a usable outcome in English.

The Bigger Pack Was Not the Better Buy. Practise reading evidence, explaining a decision, answering questions and writing a usable outcome in English.

Practise explaining evidence in English through Three Visitors at the Same Junction. Read a complete case, interpret an independent visual record, ask precise questions and produce a qualified written and spoken outcome.

Practise explaining evidence in English through Two Pencil Boxes, One Particular User. Read a complete case, interpret an independent visual record, ask precise questions and produce a qualified written and spoken outcome.

Practise explaining evidence in English through “Return” to Where?. Read a complete case, interpret an independent visual record, ask precise questions and produce a qualified written and spoken outcome.

Practise explaining evidence in English through The Parcel Fee That Was Not on the Order. Read a complete case, interpret an independent visual record, ask precise questions and produce a qualified written and spoken outcome.

Practise explaining evidence in English through The Greenhouse Number Was Ten Minutes Old. Read a complete case, interpret an independent visual record, ask precise questions and produce a qualified written and spoken outcome.

Practise explaining evidence in English through Filled In Does Not Mean Signed In. Read a complete case, interpret an independent visual record, ask precise questions and produce a qualified written and spoken outcome.

Practise explaining evidence in English through The Page That Arrived Without Its Picture. Read a complete case, interpret an independent visual record, ask precise questions and produce a qualified written and spoken outcome.

Practise explaining evidence in English through Why Did the Podcast App Choose That?. Read a complete case, interpret an independent visual record, ask precise questions and produce a qualified written and spoken outcome.

Practise explaining evidence in English through Selected Photos, Unanswered Questions. Read a complete case, interpret an independent visual record, ask precise questions and produce a qualified written and spoken outcome.

Practise explaining evidence in English through The Date Filter That Disappeared. Read a complete case, interpret an independent visual record, ask precise questions and produce a qualified written and spoken outcome.

Practise explaining evidence in English through The Citation Was Real. The Claim Was Not.. Read a complete case, interpret an independent visual record, ask precise questions and produce a qualified written and spoken outcome.

Practise explaining evidence in English through The Bigger Capacity Was Not the Whole Answer. Read a complete case, interpret an independent visual record, ask precise questions and produce a qualified written and spoken outcome.

Practise explaining evidence in English through The Kettle Was Loud, but the Heater Used More. Read a complete case, interpret an independent visual record, ask precise questions and produce a qualified written and spoken outcome.

Practise explaining evidence in English through More Visitors, More Litter: What Caused What?. Read a complete case, interpret an independent visual record, ask precise questions and produce a qualified written and spoken outcome.

Practise explaining evidence in English through An Island Plan for a Calm Evening. Read a complete case, interpret an independent visual record, ask precise questions and produce a qualified written and spoken outcome.

Practise explaining evidence in English through The Memory Effect Became Smaller. Read a complete case, interpret an independent visual record, ask precise questions and produce a qualified written and spoken outcome.

Practise explaining evidence in English through Two Bags of Estimates. Read a complete case, interpret an independent visual record, ask precise questions and produce a qualified written and spoken outcome.

Practise explaining evidence in English through More Steps, but Which Claim Is Supported?. Read a complete case, interpret an independent visual record, ask precise questions and produce a qualified written and spoken outcome.

Practise explaining evidence in English through A Diagram Is Not an Effectiveness Trial. Read a complete case, interpret an independent visual record, ask precise questions and produce a qualified written and spoken outcome.

Practise English for teaching a board game through one example round through a complete original case, focused listening and a separate visual scenario. Explain details, ask useful questions and produce a practical written and spoken outcome.

Practise English for explaining the turning point in a match through a complete original case, focused listening and a separate visual scenario. Explain details, ask useful questions and produce a practical written and spoken outcome.

Practise English for welcoming a new member to a hobby club through a complete original case, focused listening and a separate visual scenario. Explain details, ask useful questions and produce a practical written and spoken outcome.

Practise English for planning a day hike from a route and forecast through a complete original case, focused listening and a separate visual scenario. Explain details, ask useful questions and produce a practical written and spoken outcome.

Practise English for replanning a hike after a forecast change through a complete original case, focused listening and a separate visual scenario. Explain details, ask useful questions and produce a practical written and spoken outcome.

Practise English for giving composition feedback on three photographs through a complete original case, focused listening and a separate visual scenario. Explain details, ask useful questions and produce a practical written and spoken outcome.

Practise English for designing a themed photo walk through a complete original case, focused listening and a separate visual scenario. Explain details, ask useful questions and produce a practical written and spoken outcome.

Practise English for explaining how to tighten a loose cabinet handle through a complete original case, focused listening and a separate visual scenario. Explain details, ask useful questions and produce a practical written and spoken outcome.

Practise English for clarifying one ambiguous assembly step through a complete original case, focused listening and a separate visual scenario. Explain details, ask useful questions and produce a practical written and spoken outcome.

Practise English for explaining a safe bicycle puncture repair through a complete original case, focused listening and a separate visual scenario. Explain details, ask useful questions and produce a practical written and spoken outcome.

Practise English for explaining and correcting one recipe mistake through a complete original case, focused listening and a separate visual scenario. Explain details, ask useful questions and produce a practical written and spoken outcome.

A volunteer builds a visitor guide from a programme, an organiser’s account and an access note, resolving conflicts without inventing cultural rules.

Two observers turn a small public-space log into a cautious report, separating movement counts, snapshots, interpretations and unanswered questions.

Neighbours turn a vague invitation into a workable one-day volunteer campaign with roles, access details, a modest target and clear limits.

Two students compare a specific school day and discover why travel, timetable details and personal preferences matter more than national labels.

Two colleagues discuss the same ten-minute workplace break and reveal how role, timing and access affect an apparently shared custom.

A radio volunteer checks a guest’s name, pronunciation and introduction preferences across a public event and an informal conversation.

A family recipe interview moves from ingredients to memory, with corrections, follow-up questions and agreement about what may be shared.

A community archive interviewer and a contributor negotiate an object story, separating visible evidence, remembered events and personal meaning.

Evaluate four peer comments against purpose, evidence and scope, discuss reservations respectfully and produce a transparent revision note.

Narrow a broad learning problem, bring evidence of prior effort, ask one focused question and leave with a confirmed revision step.

Separate a short lecture's decision question, main ideas, evidence, examples and limitation, then turn one note page into a clear oral recap.

Audit an assignment brief, identify genuine ambiguity and write a polite message with two precise, decision-critical questions.

Turn a broad group idea into a four-minute proposal with a bounded question, reproducible public-information method, roles, quality checks and dated milestones.

Compare two open-access classroom studies by question, measure, result and limitation, then integrate them in one evidence-led synthesis paragraph.

Read a CEFR-controlled brief and the linked open-access article, then preserve its question, method, central associations and correlational limit in 150 neutral words.

Use one accessible fictional line chart to identify the pattern that answers a research question, support it with selected values, state a limit and propose a cautious next step.

A traveller requests measurements and a room-specific diagram, then postpones booking because a crucial shower feature remains unconfirmed.

A diner asks about sesame in ingredients and preparation, distinguishes uncertainty from confirmation and leaves an order unplaced when the kitchen cannot resolve the risk.

Two friends compare a written twin-room booking with a double-room reception record and agree a precise correction without treating an offer as an entitlement.

Distinguish conflicting check-in instructions, report failed access precisely, escalate partial replies and secure a safe, time-bound solution with written cost responsibility.

Compare a confirmed booking with two imperfect alternatives, uncover hidden costs and turn a vague relocation offer into a complete written arrangement.

Two friends use fixed day-plan templates to choose activities, protect meal and travel time and keep a contingency inside a shared budget.

Use a closure update, ticket conditions, step-free travel times and a rest requirement to rebuild a museum day and confirm the revised meeting plan.

Practice a bounded B1-B2 discussion and written outcome using one coherent fictional case, explicit evidence and a supplied transfer scenario.

Compare three Vienna districts through a month-long routine, separate sourced context from subjective claims and make a conditional recommendation based on commute, work, groceries, noise and total cost.

Two visitors use a closure notice, compare a bus with an indirect metro route and repair a misunderstanding about the correct exit.

Practice a bounded B1-B2 discussion and written outcome using one coherent fictional case, explicit evidence and a supplied transfer scenario.

Use a through-ticket, delay notice and three replacement routes to negotiate a workable rail itinerary and confirm exactly what is guaranteed.

Practice a bounded B1-B2 discussion and written outcome using one coherent fictional case, explicit evidence and a supplied transfer scenario.

Open an accurate baggage-tracing case, manage changing delivery addresses and leave with a clear follow-up plan.

Rebuild a time-critical, step-free city journey by reconciling three changing notices, checking a replacement service and confirming a realistic contingency.

Build a practical training request from a current skill gap, option comparison, business benefit, coverage plan and transfer measures.

Mark requirements, match them to truthful evidence and write a focused 80-word CV profile without inflating skills.

Turn one real experience into a concise STAR answer with individual actions, measurable result, honest limitation and follow-up readiness.

Move from a broad performance comment to a shared example, observable change, three measurable actions, support and review evidence.

A complete fictional meeting and chair clarification distinguish an accepted trial, a deferred purchase, a rejected suggestion and confirmed actions.

A short meeting compares two feasible team activities against the same criteria, handles a concern about participation and records a bounded decision.

An employee turns an ambiguous request into a small, agreed deliverable through a complete exchange, a written brief and an acceptance check.

Write and clarify an asynchronous handover with verified status, priority, time-zone-safe deadlines, risks, permissions and an exception path.

Transform a short release brief into a timed update that separates outcome, evidence, blockers, risks, next steps and a decision request.

Follow a complete manager email thread from early schedule risk through options, agreement, checkpoint and client-facing confirmation.

Use a realistic orientation dialogue to identify information gaps, ask focused questions, check instructions and leave with a usable five-item action list.