Enter the word for search
correlative
UK
/kəˈrɛlətɪv/
US
/kəˈrɛlətɪv/
Library
Although Sen sees the importance of the consequences of our actions as being part of ethical analysis, the general use of the capability approach tends to be static rather than dynamic, i.e. it does not take the consequences of our actions and the correlative responsibilities into account.
ethics
соответствующий
Слово описывает ответственность, соотносящуюся с последствиями поступков людей.
Disasters: Core Concepts and Ethical Theories
This Open Access Book is the first to examine disasters from a multidisciplinary perspective. Justification of actions in the face of disasters requires recourse both to conceptual analysis and ethical traditions. Part 1 of the book contains chapters on how disasters are conceptualized in different academic disciplines relevant to disasters. Part 2 has chapters on how ethical issues that arise in relation to disasters can be addressed from a number of fundamental normative approaches in moral and political philosophy. This book sets the stage for more focused normative debates given that no one book can be completely comprehensive.
The general use of the capability approach tends to be static rather than dynamic, i.e. it does not take the consequences of our actions and the correlative responsibilities into account.
general
учитывать
принимать во внимание
Принимать что-либо во внимание при оценке или понимании вопроса.
Disasters: Core Concepts and Ethical Theories
This Open Access Book is the first to examine disasters from a multidisciplinary perspective. Justification of actions in the face of disasters requires recourse both to conceptual analysis and ethical traditions. Part 1 of the book contains chapters on how disasters are conceptualized in different academic disciplines relevant to disasters. Part 2 has chapters on how ethical issues that arise in relation to disasters can be addressed from a number of fundamental normative approaches in moral and political philosophy. This book sets the stage for more focused normative debates given that no one book can be completely comprehensive.